Ccc
Rookie
Offline
I Love YaBB 2!
Posts: 16
|
Re: General Nutrition Discussion
Reply #12 - 07/12/11 at 08:58:47
The lead article on that cite, R., is written by the following person:
Kunin at 21 received his MD degree in 1955 from the University of Minnesota, and completed psychiatric residency training in 1959 at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital's Payne Whitney Clinic. Kunin was a National Institute of Health special fellow in neurophysiology at Stanford University.
I've seen Ortho MD (but he doesn't call himself that) who did post doc under Pauling. He was recommended to me by a medical professional with patients who used him in tandem with their treatment at the Dana Farber.
Also, Orthomolecular is where it started. The Pauling Institute is the current state of things. Most of our clinicians do not have a background in bio-chemistry as these researchers do/did. Second, they need to wait until consensus in their academies is attained before even beginning to bring it into clinical practice.
Now, on top of that, there is a strong push against patients doing things to make them use less pharmaceuticals. Unless it us changed to an analog or different form (as synthetic Vit d has been ... D2), it can't patented. So you get my drift? Yet my statements in NO WAY implies treatment. I also know that the web provides more than Orthomolecular medicine info that if followed could put risk in one's life (try some of these mushroom cites)
Oh that reminds me of an NIH fellow who was told to care for some soon to be deceased patients due to organ failure from eating toxic mushrooms (it was late '60 and was the fad). He got in trouble because he cured them and they lived. He had a background in bio-chem and decided he would try IV therapy of alpha-lipoic acid (the PL re omme de a daily dosage) It's now the cure for that. But this MD was on top of what was being researched in the area of Orthomolecular medicine.
When I had cancer, I questioned treatment and essentially blew zillion holes in it until my very good MDs (and they were tops) agreed that the agreed upon treatment was not defined for a case like mine (yet they would apply it). Out of 3 oncologists, I got one to brake rank. I had to say, okay I hear you but I want to know why NOT the other protocol. She responded that she just had a physician on her office with a similar profile who said, " I know that is the protocol but I know too much and I want the other". When I started to question again, the MD interupted, "I'm recommending protocol A but if it were me, I'd take protocol B".
I had one oncologist say to me, you don't want to take protocol B... On 5 years there could be such advances in science that you might regret it due to side effects. My surgeon was visibly upset whenshefou d out I was taking protocol b.
Had I followed what most of the MDs were recommending (they decide as a group and then offer patients as they come through the door), I would have been very disappointed and scared when it was released 3 years later that the treatment I received for those with my profile had very high remission rates over extended periods.
But I was the walking dead later. I definitely was leached out from chemotherapy. I asked the oncologist about recovering health by treating deficiencies (it was obvious... I could hold my 40 lb daughter on my lap). She said supplementation wasn't necessary because the meta-analysis .... Etc, etc. That's when I went to the Orthomolecular practitioner and after 2 weeks, I began to feel better... And it continued that way.
I stopped after about 5 years because it was very expensive. And I wil be honest, I didn't believe everything he wanted me to do and had a hard time being consistent. What I did learn about myself is that every body is individual as to their bio-chemical needs. We are all exposed to toxins on a daily basis. Our DNA is unique (for each individual) in producing our needs and handling the environmental toxins.
With that said, the Pauling Institute has awarded researchers in the medical field. One of which is a world leader in Vit D research.... many of you have probably heard of him. He is my MD. I choose him because of my collagen syndrome. When the fellows took history on the first visit, I explained Orthomolecular medicine and they, sadly, had no idea of what it was. Then the doctor came in with my records in one hand, introduced himself and said: I know what Orthomolecular medicine is. I just came back from the Pauling Institute. I'll write to him. (he was being modest, I later learned. He had been awarded for the second time by PL.)
Linus Pauling was awarded the Nobel Prize 2Xs... And like many pioneers in medicine with radical ideas, he was chastised much like when Dr. Judas Folkman published his theory on angiogenisis:
""Nathan said Folkman worked patiently and politely to battle critics of his angiogenesis theories. "He was kind and he was decent and he was friendly always, even to his critics," Nathan added in a telephone interview.
"Judah had the most creative mind, ceaselessly creative. You could not have a conversation with Judah without having him think of the problem in a different way. He was just bubbling over with new ideas in many areas," Nathan said.""
So the bottom line: I'm alive because I read and ask questions. There are many MDs who appreciate this sort of patient. And there are MDs who don't want the patient to ask questions. There are both bad clinician in Orthomolecular and Allopathic Medicine.... The difference is that the later is more consistently condoned.
There are a lot of people who have conditions besides MC that warrant equal care. But it doesn't hurt to think outside the box. And the idea that Orthomolecular is completely fraudulent and unsupported is incorrect. And anyone who solely relies on web sites to self treat, well they are probably quite dangerous to themselves.....anywhere... Regardless of having MC or not.
The Orthmolecular Medicine and Linus Pauling Institute was mentioned for intellectual discussion.
|