Lisa
|
Kim,
The major Mayo doctor who knows masto is Dr. Butterfield. His major area of expertise is the SM patient. If you don't fulfill the SM requirement, he will openly say you don't have mastocytosis. I don't believe that he is up on the MCAD diagnosis. He is one of those of the neoplasm camp.
What I have learned by talking to some of those patients who are up in the masto world and have years of working with or around TMS is that you have two camps of researchers - those of the classic SM form of masto and that of the wider diagnosis of MCAD. Depending upon which doctor you go to, depending upon his basic philosophy and understanding of masto, he is going to either tell you that you do not have mastocytosis and therefore a mast cell disorder, or he will diagnose you with MCAD. This seems to still be going on within the masto researchers in spite of the fact that the MCAD diagnosis has been made official.
Those of the SM camp include Butterfield, Gotlib, Metcalfe and other American doctors and most of the European experts. Those of the MCAD group are Castells, Schwartz, Escribano, Molderings and Afrin and some others whom I'm not sure of. Then you have those who straddle both groups like Akin.
What does this mean to us patients? Well, those of us who fall outside the WHO criteria for SM end up either not getting a diagnosis from the one group, or we do from the other.
But if you go to lesser doctors who are unfamiliar with the MCAD diagnosis, they are not going to be up on the MCAD diagnosis and they are going to automatically be part of the SM group since they don't know about this new diagnosis. It's going to take several years for our doctors to come up to date on the MCAD diagnosis. This is why your doctors may not be able to recognize your disease.
Kim, you are obviously not a classic SM case. If you were, then your doctors would have found it by now. This is why you keep running about in circles. Which is why you need an expert who knows and recognizes the MCAD criteria. Dr. Butterfield is good, he knows what he does, and even though he's on the dry and difficult side, that is his personality it doesn't mean that he's incapable as a doctor. Too many patients tend to look at doctors through an emotional viewpoint and they think a doctor is "good" if the doctor makes them feel good. The one has nothing to do with the other. Butterfield is good, he's an excellent reputation and he knows masto. However, he's going to stick to his guns and what he knows and that means he's going to stick with the classic mastocytosis diagnosis and if you don't fulfill those requirements, then you won't have a diagnosis and will go home empty handed and disappointed.
So, again, I recommend that you do not go to either Mayo clinic even though your doctor wants you to. I would only go there AFTER you've gone to someone like Afrin or Schwartz so that you won't find yourself being batted about.
Knowing your situation Kim, knowing how much this lack of a diagnosis is impacting upon your personal life, you must have a diagnosis NOW!
I know that you are torn in two, feeling that you must follow your doctor's advice and go where he sends you to, but we patients, in this aspect, know better than our doctors do. If you go to the Mayo right now, you will come away disappointed and you don't need this right now. You need to come away with ANSWERS so that your familly and your doctors finally can have something to explain your illness with. If you go to the Mayo now, you won't have it for there are NO DOCTORS who know mastocytosis at the Mayo in Florida. I know this because if there had been any when I asked Dr. Akin and Dr. Castells for a referral they would have told me of someone and they did not. They gave me only one doctor's name and even that doctor they said that he knew the classic SM form of masto but not the MCAD form. Those two KNOW who is who in the masto world and they KNOW that in Florida there isn't anyone there!
This is why I say, you need to go to either Schwartz or Afrin and once you can get some kind of answer with them, if you want to head up to Boston, you'll have a means to do so.
My wish is that Boston would not restrict seeing patients with already worked up cases. I understand their reasons for doing this for they are just way too short handed, but the problem is, if you don't show any MC markers, then you are unable to see them. They don't require you be fully diagnosed, but they aren't interested in having to do a full workup and this means that some patients are up a creek.
So, again, this leaves Schwartz and Afrin as your choices, Kim and I would very honestly leave Mayo on the back burner instead.
This is just my opinion. I know that there are other options, however.
Lisa
|